Peter J. Lee

159 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Peter J. Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.7k
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 75
  • Biomedical Engineering 2.0k
  • Aerospace Engineering 999
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 418
Replace A. J. C. Wilson with:
A. J. C. Wilson United Kingdom
Yoshiaki Nakano Japan
R. L. Thomas United States
David L. Olmsted United States
Norio Kobayashi Japan
O. Joubert France
An Li China
Xiaoxi Liu Japan
Shunji Goto Japan
Alan Wright United States
Peter J. Lee relative to A. J. C. Wilson United Kingdom A. J. C. Wilson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
A. J. C. Wilson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Lee. The network helps show where Peter J. Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Lee Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 165 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014305
2 2003273
3
Putting Principles into Practice: Understanding History
2005230
4 1999178
5 2005148
6 2012104
7 200396
8 200894
9 198990
10 198782
11 200981
12 198774
13 200873
14 201369
15 201262
16 198857
17 199649
18 201248
19 198846
20 200446

About Peter J. Lee

Peter J. Lee is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Aerospace Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 165 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (100 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (71 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (60 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (40 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (16 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (16 papers), HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (8 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.7k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (75 citations), Biomedical Engineering (2.0k citations), Aerospace Engineering (999 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (418 citations). Peter J. Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D. C. Larbalestier, Norman Brown, John C. Gebler, Harry A. Fozzard, Edouard S. P. Bouvier, Ying‐Qing Yu, Martin Gilár, Matthew C. Jewell, Gregory M. Lipkind and L. D. Cooley. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact