Peter J. Barker

24 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Peter J. Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 167
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 56
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 78
  • Statistics and Probability 24
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 16
Replace Rose Ga with:
Rose Ga United Kingdom
R Heikinheimo Finland
Christian S. Shinaberger United States
Daniel Tefera Dibaba United States
Priya Saxena India
Sara Quattrini Italy
Philipp Altmann United Kingdom
Christine E. McLennan United States
Akiko Yura Japan
Prateek Kumar Mehrotra India
Peter J. Barker relative to Rose Ga United Kingdom Rose Ga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18×
Rose Ga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Barker. The network helps show where Peter J. Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Barker Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005250
2 199851
3 201026
4 200522
5 199517
6 200417
7 202114
8 200112
9 201412
10 19969
11 20049
12 20049
13 19938
14
Case Studies in Cost-benefit Analysis
19756
15 19986
16 19875
17 19855
18 20045
19 20144
20 20213

About Peter J. Barker

Peter J. Barker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Demography, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (1 paper), Water resources management and optimization (1 paper) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (167 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (56 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (78 citations), Statistics and Probability (24 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (16 citations). Peter J. Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include David John Halsall, Elizabeth A. Warburton, JONATHAN REEVE, Kenneth E S Poole, Collette Rose, Nigel Loveridge, Robin Henderson, John Pickford, Karen Slade and Michael N. Fahie‐Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Lifetime Data Analysis, Journal of Infrastructure Systems, The Medical Journal of Australia, Australian Journal of Rural Health and Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact