Peter Ihm

27 papers receiving 209 citations

Peers

Peter Ihm
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Nephrology 24
  • Ecological Modeling 11
  • Statistics and Probability 20
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 30
  • Paleontology 14
Replace Mark Irwin with:
Mark Irwin United States
Colleen Kelly United States
S.S. Kind United Kingdom
Adrian Willis United Kingdom
K.A.J. Walsh New Zealand
M. Acuña Chile
Ghislain Rocheleau United States
Wanjun Gu United States
Pierpaolo Maisano Delser United Kingdom
Raymond J. Clark United States
Peter Ihm relative to Mark Irwin United States Mark Irwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Mark Irwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ihm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ihm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ihm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ihm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ihm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ihm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ihm. The network helps show where Peter Ihm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ihm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ihm Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ihm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197541
2
Statistische Methoden für Biologie und Medizin
197135
3 196532
4 200128
5 199117
6 198216
7
Biostatistical opinion of parentage : based upon the results of blood group tests
197113
8 19699
9 19668
10 19546
11 19745
12 19575
13 19715
14 19714
15 19534
16 20004
17 19763
18 19553
19
[Testing homogeneity of multidimensional medical data by means of principal component analysis].
19653
20 19873

About Peter Ihm

Peter Ihm is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Surgery and Nephrology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (1 paper), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (1 paper), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (1 paper) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (24 citations), Ecological Modeling (11 citations), Statistics and Probability (20 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (30 citations) and Paleontology (14 citations). Peter Ihm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Hermann Bock, Robert A. Sofferman, Todd G. Dray, L. G. Silvestri, Nicholas J. Hardin, G Farchi, L. R. Hill, K. Hummel, G. G. Wendt and Volker H. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Genetics and Genomics, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Current Anthropology, Human Genetics and Journal of Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact