Peter Ihm

35 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

Peter Ihm
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Ecological Modeling 18
  • Nephrology 24
  • Statistics and Probability 30
  • Paleontology 25
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
Replace L. Carotenuto with:
L. Carotenuto Italy
Sally E. Howe United States
Seung‐Ho Kang South Korea
Karsten Luebke Germany
Warren W. Esty United States
Michael Salter‐Townshend Ireland
Jan Vegelius Sweden
P. Macnaughton‐Smith United Kingdom
S.S. Kind United Kingdom
Samuel Zahl United States
Peter Ihm relative to L. Carotenuto Italy L. Carotenuto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L. Carotenuto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ihm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ihm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ihm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ihm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ihm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ihm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ihm. The network helps show where Peter Ihm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ihm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ihm Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ihm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197562
2 199152
3 196538
4
Statistische Methoden für Biologie und Medizin
197136
5 200130
6 198219
7
Biostatistical opinion of parentage : based upon the results of blood group tests
197113
8 196911
9 19669
10 20059
11 19748
12 19717
13 19547
14 19576
15 19535
16
[Testing homogeneity of multidimensional medical data by means of principal component analysis].
19655
17 19715
18 19815
19 19554
20 20004

About Peter Ihm

Peter Ihm is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Molecular Biology, Paleontology, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 40 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (1 paper), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (1 paper) and Language and cultural evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (18 citations), Nephrology (24 citations), Statistics and Probability (30 citations), Paleontology (25 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations). Peter Ihm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Hermann Bock, L. G. Silvestri, G Farchi, L. R. Hill, Nicholas J. Hardin, Robert A. Sofferman, Todd G. Dray, G. G. Wendt, K. Hummel and Hans Groenewoud. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Genetics and Genomics, International Journal of Legal Medicine, Current Anthropology, Journal of Bacteriology and The American Statistician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact