Peter Höfner

1.6k citations
75 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Höfner

73 papers receiving 984 citations

Peers

Peter Höfner
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 374
  • Software 84
  • Artificial Intelligence 463
  • Computer Networks and Communications 282
  • Information Systems 172
Replace Rui Camacho with:
Rui Camacho Portugal
Paolo Ballarini France
Olivier Ridoux France
Deepak Garg Germany
Spyros Potamianos Greece
Xiangxue Li China
Weihua Li China
Yiyuan Wang China
Umberto Nanni Italy
Per Kristian Lehre United Kingdom
Peter Höfner relative to Rui Camacho Portugal Rui Camacho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Rui Camacho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Höfner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Höfner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Höfner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Höfner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Höfner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Höfner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Höfner. The network helps show where Peter Höfner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Höfner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Höfner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Höfner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200762
2 200861
3 200758
4 200955
5 201254
6 200644
7 201142
8 200640
9 200938
10 201233
11 200733
12
Modelling and verifying the AODV routing protocol
201629
13 200826
14 201924
15 200721
16 201120
17 200820
18 202118
19 201518
20 201318

About Peter Höfner

Peter Höfner is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 75 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (32 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (30 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (19 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (11 papers), Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (10 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (6 papers) and Security and Verification in Computing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (374 citations), Software (84 citations), Artificial Intelligence (463 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (282 citations) and Information Systems (172 citations). Peter Höfner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Möller, Georg Struth, Rob van Glabbeek, Ridha Khédri, Yvette Mándi, Marius Portmann, Annabelle McIver, Wee Lum Tan, Don Batory and Gyula Farkas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, Lecture notes in computer science, Pancreatology and ACM SIGPLAN Notices.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact