Peter Höfner

1.5k citations
46 papers · 547 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Höfner

42 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Peter Höfner
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Immunology 145
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 105
  • Microbiology 41
  • Software 24
  • Artificial Intelligence 175
Replace Spyros Potamianos with:
Spyros Potamianos Greece
Thomas Conway Australia
Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche Belgium
Aditi Gupta United States
Rui Camacho Portugal
Weihua Li China
Alex Roederer United States
Sarika Jain India
Lesley A. Ward United States
Peter Höfner relative to Spyros Potamianos Greece Spyros Potamianos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Spyros Potamianos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Höfner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Höfner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Höfner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Höfner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Höfner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Höfner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Höfner. The network helps show where Peter Höfner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Höfner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Höfner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Höfner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200760
2 200860
3 200954
4 200639
5 201134
6 200732
7 200929
8 201225
9 200720
10 201916
11 200813
12 202112
13 201512
14
Supplementing Product Families with Behaviour
201111
15 200811
16 201311
17 20119
18 20099
19 20159
20 20078

About Peter Höfner

Peter Höfner is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Surgery, having authored 46 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (15 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (7 papers), Software Engineering Research (6 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (6 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers) and Distributed systems and fault tolerance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (145 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (105 citations), Microbiology (41 citations), Software (24 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (175 citations). Peter Höfner has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Möller, Yvette Mándi, Ridha Khédri, Rob van Glabbeek, Gyula Farkas, Tamás Takács, Don Batory, Ágnes K. Kocsis, Jong-Wook Kim and Annamária Szabolcs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming, Pancreatology, Helicobacter and Formal Aspects of Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact