Peter Ho

4.1k citations
117 papers · 3.2k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Ho

108 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Peter Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Urban Studies 369
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 480
  • Soil Science 504
  • Political Science and International Relations 888
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 304
Replace Lee J. Alston with:
Lee J. Alston United States
Annelies Zoomers Netherlands
Gary D. Libecap United States
Edella Schlager United States
Samuel P. S. Ho Canada
Jean‐Marie Baland Belgium
Tim Forsyth United Kingdom
Christian Lund Denmark
Kristof Van Assche Canada
Michael Redclift United Kingdom
Peter Ho relative to Lee J. Alston United States Lee J. Alston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Lee J. Alston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ho. The network helps show where Peter Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ho Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996324
2 2001163
3 2014161
4 2010153
5 2009139
6 2007122
7
Institutions in Transition: Land Ownership, Property Rights, and Social Conflict in China
2005109
8 2005104
9 201297
10 201070
11 201669
12 200564
13 201362
14 201756
15 200654
16 201153
17 201053
18 200551
19 200050
20 201750

About Peter Ho

Peter Ho is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Urban Studies, having authored 117 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (40 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (22 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (16 papers), Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact (15 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (12 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (11 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (11 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (369 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (480 citations), Soil Science (504 citations), Political Science and International Relations (888 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (304 citations). Peter Ho has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hossein Azadi, Karen R. Prowse, Sean J. Morrison, Irving L Weissman, Xiuyun Yang, Eduard B. Vermeer, Li Sun, Richard Louis Edmonds, Kiumars Zarafshani and Mingjun Peng. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Development and Change, Cities and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact