Peter Herschbach

144 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Peter Herschbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Oncology 1.8k
  • Applied Psychology 208
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 617
  • Social Psychology 712
  • Clinical Psychology 602
Replace Gerhard Henrich with:
Gerhard Henrich Germany
Heiddis Bjork Valdimarsdottir United States
Jamie L Studts United States
Frank J. Penedo United States
Susanne Singer Germany
Karen L. Weihs United States
Matthew J. Cordova United States
Torbjørn Moum Norway
David M. Clarke Australia
Amy H. Peterman United States
Peter Herschbach relative to Gerhard Henrich Germany Gerhard Henrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Gerhard Henrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Herschbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Herschbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Herschbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Herschbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Herschbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Herschbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Herschbach. The network helps show where Peter Herschbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Herschbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Herschbach Line = papers co-authored together Peter Herschbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007386
2 2009284
3 2000281
4 2006265
5 2005254
6 2004203
7 2009138
8 2009132
9 2009130
10 2009128
11 2009120
12 2002119
13 2011112
14 2013111
15 2004106
16 199997
17 201789
18 201788
19 201483
20 201782

About Peter Herschbach

Peter Herschbach is a scholar working on Oncology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 152 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (52 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (23 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (17 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (10 papers), Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Health and Medical Studies (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.8k citations), Applied Psychology (208 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (617 citations), Social Psychology (712 citations) and Clinical Psychology (602 citations). Peter Herschbach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Greece and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Henrich, Petra Berg, Andreas Dinkel, Anja Mehnert, Birgitt Marten‐Mittag, Lutz Goldbeck, Tim G. Schmitz, Sabine Waadt, Monika Keller and Gabriele Duran. Their work appears in journals such as Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer and Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact