Peter H. Proctor

26 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Peter H. Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Cell Biology 246
  • Nephrology 76
  • Sensory Systems 51
  • Biochemistry 61
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 120
Replace Shabtay Dikstein with:
Shabtay Dikstein Israel
Moo Yeol Lee South Korea
Szilvia Veszelka Hungary
Xue Zhang China
Philip Manning United Kingdom
Kumiko Takahashi Japan
Xiaoyan Wu China
Jia Xu China
Lydia M. HENDERSON United Kingdom
Jennifer D. Ly Australia
Peter H. Proctor relative to Shabtay Dikstein Israel Shabtay Dikstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Shabtay Dikstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Proctor. The network helps show where Peter H. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peter H. Proctor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter H. Proctor Line = papers co-authored together Peter H. Proctor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974369
2 1996106
3 197098
4 198290
5
Free radicals and disease in man.
198475
6 197372
7 197442
8 198635
9 200830
10 196826
11
Electron-transfer factors in psychosis and dyskinesia.
197216
12 200815
13 200715
14 199214
15 198013
16 198911
17 19916
18
A superoxide-producing system in the conjunctival mucus thread.
19776
19 19705
20
Effect of dose schedule of vitamin E and hydroxethylruticide on intestinal toxicity induced by adriamycin.
19864

About Peter H. Proctor

Peter H. Proctor is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases and Pharmacology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include melanin and skin pigmentation (4 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (2 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (2 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (1 paper), Ocular Infections and Treatments (1 paper), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (1 paper) and Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (246 citations), Nephrology (76 citations), Sensory Systems (51 citations), Biochemistry (61 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (120 citations). Peter H. Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John E. McGinness, Peter M. Corry, Edward S. Reynolds, Jose Regino Perez-Polo, Menachem Shoham, Evelyn Tiffany‐Castiglioni, Russell P. Saneto, Robert C. Blake, Richard L. Walter and Alan M. Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, The Lancet, Free Radical Biology and Medicine, Journal of Theoretical Biology and Journal of Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact