Peter Goos

215 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Peter Goos
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Management Science and Operations Research 1.6k
  • General Decision Sciences 142
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 612
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 970
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 368
Replace Bradley Jones with:
Bradley Jones United States
Martina Vandebroek Belgium
R D Tobias United States
Jean Pierre Brans Belgium
Ph. Vincke Belgium
Christine M. Anderson‐Cook United States
Christopher J. Nachtsheim United States
Angela Dean United States
C. F. Jeff Wu United States
David B. Brown United States
Peter Goos relative to Bradley Jones United States Bradley Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Bradley Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goos. The network helps show where Peter Goos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goos Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 223 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011212
2 2010192
3 2006177
4 2011135
5 2002115
6 2012101
7 201198
8 201498
9 201792
10 201692
11 201191
12 201579
13 201579
14 200876
15 200375
16 200174
17 200970
18 201169
19 202063
20 200463

About Peter Goos

Peter Goos is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 223 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (123 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (74 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (45 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (25 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (22 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (21 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (21 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (1.6k citations), General Decision Sciences (142 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (612 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (970 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (368 citations). Peter Goos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Jones, Martina Vandebroek, Roselinde Kessels, Kenneth Sörensen, Bart Vermeulen, Jie Yu, Eric D. Schoen, Utami Dyah Syafitri, A N Donev and Christophe M. Courtin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Quality Technology, Technometrics, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis and Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact