Peter Goodwin

4.8k citations
45 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Goodwin

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Goodwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Soil Science 450
  • Water Science and Technology 602
  • Ecology 829
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 289
  • Global and Planetary Change 220
Replace Eric W. Larsen with:
Eric W. Larsen United States
Jennifer A. Bountry United States
Rohan Benjankar United States
Charles A. Troendle United States
Matt Kaplinski United States
M. Bussettini Italy
Elisabeth Micheli United States
Osama Z. Al‐Hamdan United States
Mark C. Mastin United States
Sandra Ryan United States
Peter Goodwin relative to Eric W. Larsen United States Eric W. Larsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Eric W. Larsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goodwin. The network helps show where Peter Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goodwin Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goodwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015200
2 201185
3 200474
4 201265
5 200864
6 200759
7 198759
8 200858
9 201049
10 200835
11 202034
12 200733
13 201530
14 200628
15 201720
16 201716
17
New tools for aquatic habitat modeling
201115
18 202212
19 201012
20 199111

About Peter Goodwin

Peter Goodwin is a scholar working on Ecology, Water Science and Technology, Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (28 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (24 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (14 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (9 papers), Hydraulic flow and structures (5 papers), Water resources management and optimization (4 papers), Coastal and Marine Dynamics (4 papers) and Water Quality and Resources Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (450 citations), Water Science and Technology (602 citations), Ecology (829 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (289 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (220 citations). Peter Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John M. Buffington, Rohan Benjankar, Diego Caamaño, Klaus Jorde, Nancy F. Glenn, D. A. Lyn, Gregory Egger, John C. Schmidt, Sarah M. Yarnell and Geoffrey E. Petts. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Journal of Hydroinformatics, Restoration Ecology, Geomorphology and Journal of Environmental Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact