Peter Goodridge

694 citations
27 papers · 432 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Goodridge

27 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers

Peter Goodridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Economics and Econometrics 303
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 79
  • Media Technology 54
  • Strategy and Management 91
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 22
Replace Timothy Destefano with:
Timothy Destefano United States
Harald Edquist Sweden
Michal S. Gal Israel
Jae‐Yong Choung South Korea
Mark Shurmer United Kingdom
Björn Wellenius Chile
Juan Jung Spain
Yasushi Ueki Japan
Karlo Kauko Finland
Giuseppe Colangelo Italy
Peter Goodridge relative to Timothy Destefano United States Timothy Destefano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.5×
Timothy Destefano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goodridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goodridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goodridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goodridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goodridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goodridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goodridge. The network helps show where Peter Goodridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goodridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goodridge Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goodridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201968
2 201865
3 201260
4 201643
5 201338
6 201622
7 201217
8 201113
9 200812
10 202111
11 200710
12 201910
13 20149
14 20117
15 20077
16 20236
17 20116
18 20096
19 20075
20 20114

About Peter Goodridge

Peter Goodridge is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 27 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (18 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers), Regional Development and Policy (6 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (4 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers) and Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (303 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (79 citations), Media Technology (54 citations), Strategy and Management (91 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (22 citations). Peter Goodridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Haskel, Harald Edquist, Gavin Wallis, Annarosa Pesole, Xuan Li, Carol Corrado and Mark N. Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, Review of Income and Wealth, Journal of Comparative Economics, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics and National Institute Economic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact