Peter Gin

30 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Peter Gin
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biochemistry 510
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.5k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 796
  • Cell Biology 425
  • Cancer Research 315
Replace T M Forte with:
T M Forte United States
Margaret Nickel United States
Bodo Haas Germany
Gisela Stahnke United States
Qing Dallas-Yang United States
Jerry R. Faust United States
Oleg G. Khatsenko United States
M E Pape United States
Marcos L. Sznaidman United States
Gemma Llaverı́as Spain
Peter Gin relative to T M Forte United States T M Forte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×69.5×
T M Forte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gin. The network helps show where Peter Gin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gin Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007399
2 2010303
3 2009138
4 2014126
5 2009106
6 201191
7 200586
8 200784
9 200580
10 200579
11 200877
12 200877
13 200776
14 200470
15 200967
16 200366
17 201264
18 200863
19 200162
20 200655

About Peter Gin

Peter Gin is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Biochemistry, Cell Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid metabolism and disorders (21 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (14 papers), Caveolin-1 and cellular processes (11 papers), Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (9 papers), Biochemical Acid Research Studies (7 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Biochemical and biochemical processes (4 papers) and Advanced battery technologies research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (510 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (796 citations), Cell Biology (425 citations) and Cancer Research (315 citations). Peter Gin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Young, Loren G. Fong, Anne P. Beigneux, André Bensadoun, Brandon S.J. Davies, Catherine Freitag Clarke, Michael M. Weinstein, Beth Noelle Marbois, Robert O. Ryan and Kristan Melford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids, Journal of Lipid Research, Cell Metabolism and Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact