Peter Georgeson

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Georgeson
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Genetics 561
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 188
  • Clinical Biochemistry 30
  • Oncology 119
  • Cancer Research 53
Replace Lindsay Fowles with:
Lindsay Fowles Australia
Anna Abulí Spain
Thomas Paul Slavin United States
Bryce A. Seifert United States
Karim Ouldim Morocco
Keith R. Sibson United Kingdom
Jonathan Hoffman United Kingdom
Carole Corsini France
Kerry E. Kingham United States
Suad M. AlFadhli Kuwait
Peter Georgeson relative to Lindsay Fowles Australia Lindsay Fowles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Lindsay Fowles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Georgeson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Georgeson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Georgeson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Georgeson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Georgeson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Georgeson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Georgeson. The network helps show where Peter Georgeson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Georgeson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Georgeson Line = papers co-authored together Peter Georgeson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016317
2 2017247
3 202373
4 201769
5 202068
6 202450
7 201734
8 202132
9 202230
10 202128
11 202026
12 201817
13 202017
14 202216
15 201914
16 202114
17 202314
18 201712
19 202312
20 202210

About Peter Georgeson

Peter Georgeson is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (27 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (561 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (188 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (30 citations), Oncology (119 citations) and Cancer Research (53 citations). Peter Georgeson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Bernard J. Pope, Khalid Mahmood, Chol-Hee Jung, Jessica Chung, Daniel Jonathan Park, Gayle K. Philip, Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Clendenning, Ingrid Winship and Robyn Lynne Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Familial Cancer, Gastroenterology, Nature Communications, GigaScience and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact