Peter Frank

16 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Peter Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Business and International Management 40
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 99
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 49
  • Public Administration 12
  • Political Science and International Relations 69
Replace Gordon Shockley with:
Gordon Shockley United States
Alfred Vernis Spain
Sunasir Dutta United States
Lars Hulgård Denmark
Michiel Verver Netherlands
Denis Harrisson Canada
Michael J. Lynskey United Kingdom
Judith Terstriep Germany
Rosa María Fischer Brazil
Tom Montgomery United Kingdom
Peter Frank relative to Gordon Shockley United States Gordon Shockley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Gordon Shockley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Frank. The network helps show where Peter Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Frank Line = papers co-authored together Peter Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200657
2 197050
3 200828
4 201127
5 201123
6 198216
7 202315
8 201613
9 19718
10 20067
11 20107
12 19746
13 20134
14 19861
15 20031
16 19851
17 20240
18 19800
19
Comparison of the U.S. and German approaches to democratic civil-military relations
20030

About Peter Frank

Peter Frank is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Business and International Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (2 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (2 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (2 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (1 paper), Fire Detection and Safety Systems (1 paper) and Military and Defense Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (40 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (99 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (49 citations), Public Administration (12 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (69 citations). Peter Frank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Shockley, Roger R. Stough, Kingsley E. Haynes, Ronald J. Hill, Brian Y. Lattimer, Xinyan Huang, Michael A. Delichatsios, Yiannis A. Levendis, Kevin Kochersberger and Eduard Angelats. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Government and Opposition and Fire Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact