Peter Flaschel

2.6k citations
134 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Flaschel

122 papers receiving 969 citations

Peers

Peter Flaschel
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 812
  • Economics and Econometrics 949
  • Finance 153
  • Sociology and Political Science 287
  • Accounting 28
Replace Richard M. Goodwin with:
Richard M. Goodwin United Kingdom
Abba P. Lerner United States
Michael Horvath United States
Corrado Di Guilmi Australia
Niels Haldrup Denmark
Paul Gomme Canada
Neville Francis United States
Robert W. Rich United States
Christian R. Proaño Germany
Claudia Biancotti Italy
Peter Flaschel relative to Richard M. Goodwin United Kingdom Richard M. Goodwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard M. Goodwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Flaschel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Flaschel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Flaschel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Flaschel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Flaschel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Flaschel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Flaschel. The network helps show where Peter Flaschel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Flaschel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Flaschel Line = papers co-authored together Peter Flaschel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200648
2 200940
3 200540
4 200838
5 200630
6 198728
7 200726
8 200925
9 200125
10 201125
11 200023
12 199623
13 201722
14 198421
15 200319
16 198318
17 200318
18 201118
19 200816
20 201216

About Peter Flaschel

Peter Flaschel is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Finance and Accounting, having authored 134 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Policy (96 papers), Economic theories and models (92 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (35 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (25 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (15 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (14 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (7 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (812 citations), Economics and Econometrics (949 citations), Finance (153 citations), Sociology and Political Science (287 citations) and Accounting (28 citations). Peter Flaschel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Carl Chiarella, Willi Semmler, Christian R. Proaño, Reiner Franke, Peter Skøtt, Alfred Greiner, Roberto Veneziani, Toichiro Asada, Pu Chen and Gang Gong. Their work appears in journals such as Metroeconomica, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Review of Political Economy, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization and Computational Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact