Peter Fedor
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 24
-
- Plant and animal studies 11
- Co-authors
- Ian F. Spellerberg (3 shared papers)Pavol Prokop (24 shared papers)Jana Fančovičová (3 shared papers)Martina Zvaríková (18 shared papers)Josef Havel (3 shared papers)Jaromír Vaňhara (4 shared papers)Igor Malenovský (2 shared papers)František Šťáhlavský (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Fedor
64 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peter Fedor's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 168
- Insect Science 265
- Ecological Modeling 92
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 237
- Ecology 418
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 250
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Fedor
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Fedor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Fedor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Fedor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Fedor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Fedor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Fedor. The network helps show where Peter Fedor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Fedor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’ Index Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1050 |
| 2 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 12 |
About Peter Fedor
Peter Fedor is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (24 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (6 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (265 citations), Ecological Modeling (92 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (237 citations), Ecology (418 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (250 citations). Peter Fedor has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Ian F. Spellerberg, Pavol Prokop, Jana Fančovičová, Martina Zvaríková, Josef Havel, Jaromír Vaňhara, Igor Malenovský, František Šťáhlavský, Marek Svitok and Lukáš Varga. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Biological Cybernetics, International Journal of Neural Systems, Plant Signaling & Behavior and Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.