Peter E. Scott

38 papers receiving 773 citations

Peers

Peter E. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 511
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 287
  • Ecological Modeling 78
  • Developmental Biology 38
  • Ecology 309
Replace James A. Reinartz with:
James A. Reinartz United States
E. Eugene Spears United States
Rainer Dolch Madagascar
Karin Schiegg Switzerland
Viki Vandomme Belgium
Guillermo Ibarra‐Núñez Mexico
Curtis S. Adkisson United States
Jorge A. Lobo Costa Rica
Carlos Lara‐Romero Spain
Cezary Mitrus Poland
Peter E. Scott relative to James A. Reinartz United States James A. Reinartz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
James A. Reinartz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Scott. The network helps show where Peter E. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter E. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Peter E. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010180
2 198871
3 201060
4 200149
5 200147
6 198445
7 199938
8 200032
9 199331
10 200226
11
Wildlife in Danger
196925
12 200524
13 200224
14 199822
15 200422
16 198317
17 200214
18 199413
19 199613
20 200413

About Peter E. Scott

Peter E. Scott is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 41 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (9 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (511 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (287 citations), Ecological Modeling (78 citations), Developmental Biology (38 citations) and Ecology (309 citations). Peter E. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert F. Martin, Sue Boinski, Robert P. Jean, Gary A. Glowacki, Noel B. Pavlovic, Steven L. Lima, Ralph Grundel, Krystalynn J. Frohnapple, Travis L. DeVault and Brandon P. Anthony. Their work appears in journals such as The Auk, Biotropica, Journal of Wildlife Management, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society and Oryx.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact