Peter Donahue

13 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Peter Donahue
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Public Administration 66
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • General Health Professions 187
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 9
  • Research and Theory 6
Replace Caroline Rosenthal Gelman with:
Caroline Rosenthal Gelman United States
Roberta R. Greene United States
James T. Decker United States
Ann E. MacEachron United States
Anne L. Strozier United States
Narayan Gopalkrishnan Australia
Eleni Hatzidimitriadou United Kingdom
Ana Barrón López de Roda Spain
Robert F. Rivas United States
Parvaneh Rabiee United Kingdom
Peter Donahue relative to Caroline Rosenthal Gelman United States Caroline Rosenthal Gelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Caroline Rosenthal Gelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Donahue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Donahue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Donahue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Donahue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Donahue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Donahue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Donahue. The network helps show where Peter Donahue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Donahue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Donahue Line = papers co-authored together Peter Donahue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006135
2 2021106
3 200855
4 200646
5 200543
6 198541
7
Experiences of being homeless or at risk of being homeless among Canadian youths.
200424
8 201123
9 200518
10 201712
11 200011
12 199511
13 19954

About Peter Donahue

Peter Donahue is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Public Administration, having authored 13 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers) and Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (66 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations), General Health Professions (187 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (9 citations) and Research and Theory (6 citations). Peter Donahue has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Elsa Marziali, Lynn McDonald, Andrea Greenblatt, Deepy Sur, Rachelle Ashcroft, Thecla Damianakis, Pamela C. Miller, Naeem Jan, John Thoms and Véronique Boscart. Their work appears in journals such as Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, Journal de Physique I, Aging & Mental Health and Ageing and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact