Peter Döbbeler

610 citations
59 papers · 481 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Döbbeler

56 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Peter Döbbeler
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 364
  • Cell Biology 188
  • Plant Science 415
  • Ecology 48
  • Pharmacology 25
Replace Raquel Pino‐Bodas with:
Raquel Pino‐Bodas Spain
Samantha Fernández-Brime Sweden
Nora Wirtz United States
Manuela Dal Forno United States
José Luis Chaves United States
Adam Flakus Poland
G. C. Lewis United Kingdom
Marlena Lembicz Poland
Tassilo Feuerer United States
Armin Mangold United States
Peter Döbbeler relative to Raquel Pino‐Bodas Spain Raquel Pino‐Bodas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Raquel Pino‐Bodas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Döbbeler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Döbbeler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Döbbeler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Döbbeler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Döbbeler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Döbbeler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Döbbeler. The network helps show where Peter Döbbeler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter Döbbeler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Döbbeler Line = papers co-authored together Peter Döbbeler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200991
2 197856
3 200239
4 200319
5 200517
6 200417
7 200415
8 201915
9 201013
10
Contributions to lichenology : Festschrift in Honour of Hannes Hertel
200412
11 201312
12 200611
13 200710
14 19989
15 20179
16 20107
17 19797
18 20107
19
Contributions to Lichenology
20047
20 19997

About Peter Döbbeler

Peter Döbbeler is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (36 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (30 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (26 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (23 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (20 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (8 papers), Plant Pathogens and Resistance (3 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (364 citations), Cell Biology (188 citations), Plant Science (415 citations), Ecology (48 citations) and Pharmacology (25 citations). Peter Döbbeler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Seppo Huhtinen, Soili Stenroos, Jaakko Hyvönen, Leena Myllys, Gerhard Rambold, Michal Sochor, Paul G. Davison, Jacques van Rooy, William R. Buck and Eva Facher. Their work appears in journals such as Mycological Progress, Mycologia, Nova Hedwigia, Sydowia and Journal of Bryology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact