Peter Diener

4.2k citations
44 papers · 2.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Diener

43 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Peter Diener
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.4k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.0k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 249
  • Geophysics 230
  • Oceanography 145
Replace Manuel Tiglio with:
Manuel Tiglio United States
Ian Hinder United States
Denis Pollney United States
Manuela Campanelli United States
Miguel Alcubierre Mexico
Scott E. Field United States
Roland Haas United States
Yosef Zlochower United States
Thomas W. Baumgarte United States
Éric Gourgoulhon France
Peter Diener relative to Manuel Tiglio United States Manuel Tiglio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Manuel Tiglio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Diener

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Diener's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Diener with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Diener more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Diener

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Diener. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Diener. The network helps show where Peter Diener may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Diener, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Diener Line = papers co-authored together Peter Diener links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003388
2 2008309
3 2007199
4 2009159
5 2007157
6 2007139
7 2011118
8 200885
9 201784
10 200780
11 201480
12 200865
13 201160
14 200656
15 200654
16 201449
17 201248
18
Numerical simulations of loop quantum Bianchi-I spacetimes
201747
19 200547
20 200745

About Peter Diener

Peter Diener is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Ocean Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (37 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (34 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (14 papers), Geophysics and Sensor Technology (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (4 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (3 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.4k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.0k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (249 citations), Geophysics (230 citations) and Oceanography (145 citations). Peter Diener has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Denis Pollney, Erik Schnetter, Michael Koppitz, Christian Reisswig, Bernd Brügmann, Luciano Rezzolla, Manuel Tiglio, Edward Seidel, Ernst Nils Dorband and Ryōji Takahashi. Their work appears in journals such as Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Computational Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact