Peter Dedeken

909 citations
35 papers · 430 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Dedeken

34 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Peter Dedeken
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 270
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 137
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 56
  • Neurology 33
  • Neurology 15
Replace Daniela Audenino with:
Daniela Audenino Italy
А. В. Лебедева Russia
Rupprecht Thorbecke Germany
Irene A.W. Kotsopoulos Netherlands
Justin Martello United States
Pudukode R. Krishnan Bahrain
Paul Timmings New Zealand
Ulrich Specht Germany
Jens‐Peter Reese Germany
Rana Kurdi Qatar
Peter Dedeken relative to Daniela Audenino Italy Daniela Audenino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Daniela Audenino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dedeken

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dedeken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dedeken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dedeken more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dedeken

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dedeken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dedeken. The network helps show where Peter Dedeken may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dedeken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Dedeken Line = papers co-authored together Peter Dedeken links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201549
2 201547
3 201536
4 201433
5 201030
6 201627
7 201822
8 201921
9 202019
10 201716
11 201615
12
DRUG UTILIZATION STUDY WITH LACOSAMIDE IN DAILY CLINICAL PRACTICE IN BELGIUM: AN INTERIM ANALYSIS
201213
13 201610
14 202010
15 20129
16 20218
17 20177
18 20197
19 20197
20 20217

About Peter Dedeken

Peter Dedeken is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (24 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (13 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (270 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (137 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (56 citations), Neurology (33 citations) and Neurology (15 citations). Peter Dedeken has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Rwanda and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Boon, Dirk E. Teuwen, Azita Tofighy, Simon Borghs, Marc De Backer, J Casselman, Stephan Vlaminck, Frank Tennigkeit, Ludo Vanopdenbosch and Matthias Noack‐Rink. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Epilepsy & Behavior, Epilepsia, BMC Neurology and Epilepsia Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact