Peter Damborg

3.4k citations
89 papers · 2.3k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Damborg

86 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Peter Damborg
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Molecular Medicine 528
  • Microbiology 346
  • Clinical Biochemistry 357
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 85
  • Infectious Diseases 795
Replace Constança Pomba with:
Constança Pomba Portugal
Merja Rantala Finland
Antina Lübke‐Becker Germany
Christina Greko Sweden
Björn Bengtsson Sweden
Arshnee Moodley Denmark
J. Torren‐Edo Netherlands
Bernd‐Alois Tenhagen Germany
Shabbir Simjee United States
Ole Eske Heuer Denmark
Peter Damborg relative to Constança Pomba Portugal Constança Pomba's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Constança Pomba · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Damborg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Damborg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Damborg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Damborg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Damborg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Damborg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Damborg. The network helps show where Peter Damborg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Damborg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Damborg Line = papers co-authored together Peter Damborg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015153
2 2017125
3 201698
4 201779
5 200476
6 201676
7 201474
8 200970
9 200865
10 201762
11 202158
12 201753
13 201253
14 201150
15 201549
16 201548
17 201747
18 202144
19 201744
20 200943

About Peter Damborg

Peter Damborg is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, Clinical Biochemistry and Microbiology, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (22 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (21 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (18 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (10 papers), Gut microbiota and health (8 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (8 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (8 papers) and Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (528 citations), Microbiology (346 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (357 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (85 citations) and Infectious Diseases (795 citations). Peter Damborg has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Luca Guardabassi, Arshnee Moodley, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Teresa Pires dos Santos, John Elmerdahl Olsen, Per Brinch Hansen, Els M. Broens, Lisbeth Rem Jessen, Pierre‐Louis Toutain and Natalia Molchanova. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Microbiology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Frontiers in Microbiology, Veterinary Dermatology and Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact