Peter Dale

1.5k citations
58 papers · 880 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Dale

51 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Peter Dale
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Public Administration 93
  • Geography, Planning and Development 105
  • Clinical Psychology 282
  • Safety Research 101
  • Soil Science 112
Replace Ann‐Margaret Esnard with:
Ann‐Margaret Esnard United States
Keith D. Harries United States
G.E. Frerks Netherlands
Jerry T. Mitchell United States
Sonia Freeman Australia
Robert C. Burns United States
J. Eugene Haas United States
Michael S. Scott United States
Jonathan Ensor United Kingdom
M. G. Lloyd United Kingdom
Peter Dale relative to Ann‐Margaret Esnard United States Ann‐Margaret Esnard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.1×
Ann‐Margaret Esnard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dale. The network helps show where Peter Dale may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Dale Line = papers co-authored together Peter Dale links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970140
2 2004115
3 198977
4
Edge to edge
199668
5
Dangerous Families: Assessment and Treatment of Child Abuse
198655
6 199653
7 197950
8 200031
9 197228
10 199724
11 199818
12 198616
13 199816
14 200115
15 199713
16 198511
17 199710
18
What Really Happened?: Child Protection Case Management of Infants with Serious Injuries and Discrepant Parental Explanations
200210
19 20048
20 20028

About Peter Dale

Peter Dale is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Geography, Planning and Development, Building and Construction, Safety Research and Soil Science, having authored 58 papers that have together received 880 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (12 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (10 papers), 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (10 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (7 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (6 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers) and Historical Geography and Cartography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (93 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (105 citations), Clinical Psychology (282 citations), Safety Research (101 citations) and Soil Science (112 citations). Peter Dale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John McLaughlin, John B. Wright, John McLaughlin, Richard J. Chorley, Richard Green, Lynda Measor, Tony Morrison, Derek Austin, Jim Waters and Robin McLaren. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Child Abuse Review, Journal of Family Therapy, Australian Surveyor and Cities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact