Peter Copley
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Avian ecology and behavior
Papers in
- Ecology 12
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 8
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 3
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 3
- Ecology and biodiversity studies 2
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 3
- Co-authors
- David Priddel (1 shared paper)Robert A Wheeler (1 shared paper)Laura Ruykys (2 shared papers)KE Moseby (3 shared papers)Keith Morris (1 shared paper)John Read (3 shared papers)Jeff Short (1 shared paper)Rebecca S. West (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Pacific Conservation Biology (2 papers)Wildlife Research (2 papers)Biological Conservation (2 papers)Emu - Austral Ornithology (1 paper)Conservation Genetics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanyPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Peter Copley
12 papers receiving 130 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Ecological Modeling 41
- Ecology 117
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 38
- Paleontology 14
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Copley
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Copley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Copley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Copley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Copley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Copley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Copley. The network helps show where Peter Copley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Copley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 0 |
About Peter Copley
Peter Copley is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and General Health Professions, having authored 13 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (3 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (2 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (2 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (41 citations), Ecology (117 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (38 citations), Paleontology (14 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (22 citations). Peter Copley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include David Priddel, Robert A Wheeler, Laura Ruykys, KE Moseby, Keith Morris, John Read, Jeff Short, Rebecca S. West, Graeme R. Gillespie and Sarah Legge. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Conservation Biology, Wildlife Research, Biological Conservation, Emu - Austral Ornithology and Conservation Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.