Peter Cockcroft

1.2k citations
54 papers · 534 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Cockcroft

51 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Peter Cockcroft
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Small Animals 141
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 160
  • Equine 18
  • Family Practice 18
  • Speech and Hearing 65
Replace Sebastian Arlt with:
Sebastian Arlt Germany
Kathrin Schemann Australia
Peggy L. Schmidt United States
Joanne Hewson Canada
Kirsten E. Bailey Australia
John J. Dascanio United States
Vivienne Duggan Ireland
Matt D. Miesner United States
C. E. Wylie United Kingdom
Anne Fawcett Australia
Peter Cockcroft relative to Sebastian Arlt Germany Sebastian Arlt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sebastian Arlt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cockcroft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cockcroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cockcroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cockcroft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cockcroft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cockcroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cockcroft. The network helps show where Peter Cockcroft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cockcroft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Cockcroft Line = papers co-authored together Peter Cockcroft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Clinical Examination of Farm Animals
2002113
2 200396
3 202128
4 200027
5 200421
6 200717
7 201414
8 200413
9 200512
10 200411
11 200411
12 199311
13 20169
14
The likelihood of subclinical mastitis in quarters with different types of teat lesions in the dairy cow.
20009
15 20229
16 19999
17 20178
18 19958
19 20057
20 20217

About Peter Cockcroft

Peter Cockcroft is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Speech and Hearing, Infectious Diseases and Surgery, having authored 54 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (15 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (7 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers), Animal health and immunology (4 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (141 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (160 citations), Equine (18 citations), Family Practice (18 citations) and Speech and Hearing (65 citations). Peter Cockcroft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Jackson, Mark A. Holmes, Mark J. Holmes, Michael P. Reichel, Kamalan Jeevaratnam, Vishna Devi Nadarajah, Frances Henson, Christine Parker, Farhid Hemmatzadeh and Sasha R. Lanyon. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Australian Veterinary Journal, Small Ruminant Research, Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation and Veterinary Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact