Peter C. Pineo

21 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Peter C. Pineo
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 18
  • Demography 100
  • Sociology and Political Science 284
  • Health 44
  • Social Psychology 100
Replace Klas Borell with:
Klas Borell Sweden
Peggy Hutchison Canada
Anne Gray United Kingdom
Nicole L. Asquith Australia
Marília Patta Ramos Brazil
Ping Kwong Kam Hong Kong
Jorge Chapa United States
Robert W. Duff United States
Wander van der Vaart Netherlands
Julia Simonson Germany
Peter C. Pineo relative to Klas Borell Sweden Klas Borell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Klas Borell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Pineo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Pineo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Pineo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Pineo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Pineo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Pineo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Pineo. The network helps show where Peter C. Pineo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Pineo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Pineo Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Pineo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1977170
2 1961108
3 198859
4 198336
5 196231
6 197731
7 196719
8 197616
9 196014
10 198811
11 19749
12 19589
13 19696
14 20023
15 19883
16 19702
17 19682
18 19882
19 19772
20 19832

About Peter C. Pineo

Peter C. Pineo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Demography, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Education and Linguistics and Language, having authored 22 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers), Rural development and sustainability (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (18 citations), Demography (100 citations), Sociology and Political Science (284 citations), Health (44 citations) and Social Psychology (100 citations). Peter C. Pineo has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Goyder, E. Dianne Looker, Robert A. Dentler, Sam Bass Warner, Frank E. Jones, Mónica Boyd, Lorne Tepperman, John W. Porter, Patricia Denton and Peter H. Rossi. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, American Sociological Review, Sociological Quarterly, American Journal of Sociology and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact