Peter Burns

957 citations
14 papers · 556 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Burns

12 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Peter Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Sociology and Political Science 485
  • Political Science and International Relations 200
  • Law 45
  • Communication 25
  • Clinical Psychology 66
Replace Gerald E. Dirks with:
Gerald E. Dirks Canada
Joel S. Fetzer United States
Harold E. Pepinsky United States
Elizabeth F. Cohen United States
Randall Kennedy United States
Serhat Karakayalı Germany
Riva Kastoryano France
Albert W. Dzur United States
Joseph Ruane Ireland
Carmen González Enríquez Spain
Peter Burns relative to Gerald E. Dirks Canada Gerald E. Dirks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Gerald E. Dirks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Burns. The network helps show where Peter Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Peter Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Burns Line = papers co-authored together Peter Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000457
2 200445
3 198931
4 19896
5 19833
6
Criminal injuries compensation: Social remedy or political palliative for victims of crime?
19803
7
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Constitutional Bulwark or Colonial Remnant?
19842
8 19742
9
The Good Neighbour on Trial: Good Neighbours Make Bad Law
19832
10
The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: How it is Still Better to Light a Candle than to Curse the Darkness?
19981
11
THE LAW AND PRIVACY: THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE
19761
12
Civil Conspiracy: An Unwieldy Vessel Rides a Judicial Tempest
19821
13 19781
14
A casebook in the law of crimes
19681

About Peter Burns

Peter Burns is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 556 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Environmental law and policy (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper), International Law and Human Rights (1 paper) and Freedom of Expression and Defamation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (485 citations), Political Science and International Relations (200 citations), Law (45 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (66 citations). Peter Burns has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include James G. Gimpel, J. C. Smith and Obiora Chinedu Okafor. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Indonesia, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Modern Law Review and Alberta Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact