Alberta Law Review

907 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 907 papers published in Alberta Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Alberta Law Review usually cover Law (445 papers), Political Science and International Relations (279 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (259 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (131 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (121 papers) and Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (109 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Alberta Law Review are David Schneiderman, Richard Bauman, Joan Brockman, Nicholas Bala, Timothy Caulfield, Mitchell McInnes, Ronald Dworkin, Michael Asch, Nigel Bankes and Peter H. Russell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Alberta Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Alberta Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Alberta Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Alberta Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Alberta Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Alberta Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alberta Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025