Peter Broadwell

407 citations
31 papers · 274 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Broadwell

24 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Peter Broadwell
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • General Social Sciences 20
  • Literature and Literary Theory 47
  • Health 22
  • Information Systems and Management 16
  • Communication 16
Replace Sneha Jha with:
Sneha Jha India
Aviv J. Sharon Israel
Lu He United States
Tuo Liu Germany
Wenjing Pian China
Shuotian Bai China
Tae Min Song South Korea
Chengda Zheng Canada
Yue Su China
Chenyan Jia United States
Peter Broadwell relative to Sneha Jha India Sneha Jha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Sneha Jha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Broadwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Broadwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Broadwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Broadwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Broadwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Broadwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Broadwell. The network helps show where Peter Broadwell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Broadwell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Broadwell Line = papers co-authored together Peter Broadwell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202063
2 201253
3 202024
4 202221
5 201620
6 201815
7 202011
8 200110
9
Response Time as a Performability Metric for Online Services
20049
10 20217
11 20166
12 20175
13 20225
14 20145
15 20164
16 20223
17 20232
18 20192
19
Confusing the Modern Breakthrough: Naïve Bayes Classification of Authors and Works
20182
20
“Hvad der byggedes om dagen, blev revet ned om natten...”. Word Sequence Repetition in Danish Legend Tradition
20172

About Peter Broadwell

Peter Broadwell is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions and Information Systems, having authored 31 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health via Writing (7 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (6 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (4 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (2 papers) and Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (20 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (47 citations), Health (22 citations), Information Systems and Management (16 citations) and Communication (16 citations). Peter Broadwell has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Timothy R. Tangherlini, James Abello, Sunmoo Yoon, Michelle Odlum, Carmela Alcántara, Nathalie Moise, Adler Perotte, Ian M. Kronish, Martin Klein and Haeyoung Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Folklore Research, PLoS ONE, JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, Journal of American Folklore and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact