Peter Breiner

456 citations
22 papers · 231 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Breiner

19 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

Peter Breiner
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Political Science and International Relations 103
  • Anthropology 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
  • Classics 8
  • Public Administration 7
Replace Peter Schöttler with:
Peter Schöttler Germany
William R. Polk United States
Jacques Steenbergen Belgium
Geoffrey MacCormack United Kingdom
Stephen Taylor United Kingdom
Paul W. Werth United States
Nicolas Roussellier France
Jean Leca France
Catherine Evtuhov United States
Michael Bentley United Kingdom
Peter Breiner relative to Peter Schöttler Germany Peter Schöttler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Peter Schöttler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Breiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Breiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Breiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Breiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Breiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Breiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Breiner. The network helps show where Peter Breiner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter Breiner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Breiner Line = papers co-authored together Peter Breiner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993121
2 199647
3 200410
4 20088
5 20057
6 19956
7 19995
8 20044
9 20114
10 20043
11 20133
12 20043
13 19893
14 20072
15 20031
16 20061
17 19931
18 20191
19 20141
20 20180

About Peter Breiner

Peter Breiner is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Anthropology and Law, having authored 22 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (9 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (9 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Political Theory and Influence (3 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (103 citations), Anthropology (30 citations), Sociology and Political Science (129 citations), Classics (8 citations) and Public Administration (7 citations). Peter Breiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Dunn. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, European Journal of Political Theory, Perspectives on Politics, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and The Journal of Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact