Peter Bono
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
-
- Surgical site infection prevention
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
- Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
- Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Papers in
- Surgery 9
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 5
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 2
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 8
- Co-authors
- Ann Marie Chrin (1 shared paper)Michael J. Bolesta (1 shared paper)Glenn R. Rechtine (1 shared paper)David W. Cahill (1 shared paper)Teck M. Soo (9 shared papers)Doris Tong (9 shared papers)Heikki Joensuu (6 shared papers)R. Kokko (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Spine (3 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (3 papers)Cancer Research (2 papers)Quality Management in Health Care (1 paper)The Spine Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenFinland
In The Last Decade
Peter Bono
17 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 164
- Surgery 246
- Rehabilitation 14
- Cancer Research 21
- Pharmacology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bono
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bono's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bono with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bono more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bono
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bono. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bono. The network helps show where Peter Bono may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bono, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 189 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 1 |
About Peter Bono
Peter Bono is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 17 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (8 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (4 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (4 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (164 citations), Surgery (246 citations), Rehabilitation (14 citations), Cancer Research (21 citations) and Pharmacology (21 citations). Peter Bono has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Ann Marie Chrin, Michael J. Bolesta, Glenn R. Rechtine, David W. Cahill, Teck M. Soo, Doris Tong, Heikki Joensuu, R. Kokko, Chad F. Claus and Boyd Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research, Quality Management in Health Care and The Spine Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.