Peter Bien
Impact in
- General Social Sciences top 1%
- Philosophical Thought and Analysis
-
- Modernist Literature and Criticism
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
Papers in
- Philosophy 13
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 11
- Philosophical and Cultural Analysis 3
-
- Philosophical Thought and Analysis 11
- Co-authors
- Virginia Woolf (6 shared papers)Nigel Nicolson (3 shared papers)Robert Martin Adams (1 shared paper)Peter Mackridge (2 shared papers)Anthony Burgess (1 shared paper)Andrew McNeillie (3 shared papers)Anne Olivier Bell (2 shared papers)Philip Larkin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of modern Greek studies (8 papers)World Literature Today (31 papers)Comparative Literature (2 papers)The Classical World (1 paper)Slavic Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Bien
27 papers receiving 103 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- General Social Sciences 44
- Literature and Literary Theory 67
- Philosophy 61
- Music 11
- Classics 11
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bien
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bien. The network helps show where Peter Bien may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1980 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 13 | NIKOS KAZANTZAKIS-NOVELIST | 1989 | 5 |
| 14 | 1989 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1975 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 2 |
About Peter Bien
Peter Bien is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Social Sciences, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Anthropology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (11 papers), Philosophical Thought and Analysis (11 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (8 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies (4 papers) and Philosophical and Cultural Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Social Sciences (44 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations), Philosophy (61 citations), Music (11 citations) and Classics (11 citations). Peter Bien has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Virginia Woolf, Nigel Nicolson, Robert Martin Adams, Peter Mackridge, Anthony Burgess, Andrew McNeillie, Anne Olivier Bell, Philip Larkin, Ian McEwan and Bernard F. Dick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of modern Greek studies, World Literature Today, Comparative Literature, The Classical World and Slavic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.