Peter Beal
Impact in
Papers in
- Journals
- The Library (3 papers)Early Modern Women An Interdisciplinary Journal (1 paper)The Yearbook of English Studies (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (4 papers)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Peter Beal
13 papers receiving 241 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Classics 133
- History 234
- Literature and Literary Theory 185
- Museology 26
- Anthropology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Beal
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Beal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Beal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Beal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Beal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Beal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Beal. The network helps show where Peter Beal may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Peter Beal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 124 | |
| 2 | In Praise of Scribes: Manuscripts and their Makers in Seventeenth-Century England | 1998 | 119 |
| 3 | Index of English Literary Manuscripts | 1980 | 90 |
| 4 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 5 | Elizabeth I and the culture of writing | 2007 | 13 |
| 6 | 1980 | 11 | |
| 7 | Writings by early modern women | 2000 | 6 |
| 8 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 10 | Bouldering: Movement, Tactics, and Problem Solving | 2011 | 2 |
| 11 | Manuscripts and their makers in the English Renaissance | 2002 | 1 |
| 12 | Introduction: Do Manuscript Studies in the Early Modern Period Have a Future? | 2004 | 1 |
| 13 | New texts and discoveries in early modern English manuscripts | 2007 | 1 |
| 14 | Discovering, identifying and editing early modern manuscripts | 2013 | 1 |
| 15 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 20 | Parnassus biceps, or, Severall choice pieces of poetry | 1990 | 1 |
About Peter Beal
Peter Beal is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Museology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (133 citations), History (234 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (185 citations), Museology (26 citations) and Anthropology (69 citations). Frequent co-authors include A. S. G. Edwards and Margaret J. M. Ezell. Their work appears in journals such as The Library, Early Modern Women An Interdisciplinary Journal, The Yearbook of English Studies, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.