Peter Agger

1.3k citations
65 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Agger

58 papers receiving 975 citations

Peers

Peter Agger
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Reproductive Medicine 218
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 323
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 125
  • Surgery 201
  • Urology 27
Replace Liberato J.A. DiDio with:
Liberato J.A. DiDio United States
Robert E. Cartee United States
Jack A. Goldman Israel
Gerd Steding Germany
L. Brown United Kingdom
Isabelle Masseau Canada
Luís Balthazar Saldanha Brazil
Fabio Acocella Italy
Daniel K. Roberts United States
Carolina Scala Italy
Peter Agger relative to Liberato J.A. DiDio United States Liberato J.A. DiDio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Liberato J.A. DiDio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Agger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Agger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Agger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Agger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Agger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Agger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Agger. The network helps show where Peter Agger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Agger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Agger Line = papers co-authored together Peter Agger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197883
2 201178
3 200875
4 197173
5 197873
6 201541
7 200939
8 202036
9 201734
10 197132
11 201526
12 201525
13 201624
14 198022
15 201320
16 201020
17 201719
18 201018
19 201518
20 201317

About Peter Agger

Peter Agger is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Epidemiology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (17 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (7 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (7 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (6 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (6 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (6 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (218 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (323 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (125 citations), Surgery (201 citations) and Urology (27 citations). Peter Agger has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Svend G. Johnsen, Robert Henry Anderson, Morten Holdgaard Smerup, Michael Pedersen, Robert Stanley Stephenson, Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal, Christoffer Laustsen, Paul P. Lunkenheimer, Jesper R. Frandsen and Steffen Ringgaard. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, The Anatomical Record, Scientific Reports, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Clinical Anatomy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact