Peter A.C. Lim

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter A.C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Rehabilitation 280
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 74
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 101
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 125
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 92
Replace T. Smits with:
T. Smits Netherlands
Katarzyna Barczyk Poland
Martin Liebetrau Germany
Maria Mercedes Santoro Italy
Xiangyu Chen China
Tsuyoshi Sato Japan
Ronit Gavrieli Israel
David Marshall United States
Megumi Goto Japan
John David United States
Peter A.C. Lim relative to T. Smits Netherlands T. Smits's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
T. Smits · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A.C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A.C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A.C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A.C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A.C. Lim. The network helps show where Peter A.C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter A.C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter A.C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together Peter A.C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005384
2 2002158
3
A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients.
2001109
4 2002107
5 200792
6 200572
7 200763
8 200924
9 200423
10 202120
11 202016
12 200014
13 202010
14 20127
15 20007
16 20115
17 20004
18 20004
19 20004
20 20083

About Peter A.C. Lim

Peter A.C. Lim is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (1 paper) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (280 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (74 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (101 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (125 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (92 citations). Peter A.C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Tauseef R. Butt, X Zuo, Suzanne C. Edavettal, Jeffrey G. Marblestone, Yiting Lim, Huma Qureshy, Helene Henson, Trilok N. Monga, Adela Tow and Elizabeth J. Protas. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Protein Expression and Purification, Clinical Rehabilitation and Physics of Fluids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact