Pete Coffee

66 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Pete Coffee
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Applied Psychology 314
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 679
  • Social Psychology 887
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 104
  • Gender Studies 230
Replace Emma Guillet‐Descas with:
Emma Guillet‐Descas France
Jamie B. Barker United Kingdom
Guillaume Martinent France
Alex J. Benson Canada
Mark Nesti United Kingdom
David O. Trouilloud France
Bradley W. Young Canada
Rylee A. Dionigi Australia
David Gilbourne United Kingdom
Jay C. Kimiecik United States
Pete Coffee relative to Emma Guillet‐Descas France Emma Guillet‐Descas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Emma Guillet‐Descas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pete Coffee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Coffee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Coffee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Coffee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Coffee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Coffee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Coffee. The network helps show where Pete Coffee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pete Coffee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pete Coffee Line = papers co-authored together Pete Coffee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015184
2 2014167
3 201798
4 201187
5 201479
6 201858
7 201457
8 201452
9 201447
10 201143
11 201438
12 201938
13 202138
14 201437
15 201937
16 200937
17 202337
18 201433
19 201933
20 201732

About Pete Coffee

Pete Coffee is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Applied Psychology, Gender Studies and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (38 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (31 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (21 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (15 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (13 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (11 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (4 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (314 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (679 citations), Social Psychology (887 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (104 citations) and Gender Studies (230 citations). Pete Coffee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tim Rees, David E. Lavallee, S. Alex Haslam, Paul B Freeman, Jamie B. Barker, Niklas K. Steffens, Matthew J. Slater, Remco C. J. Polman, Mark R. Stevens and Marc V. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of sport and exercise, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, The Sport Psychologist, Sport Exercise and Performance Psychology and International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact