Percy Poon
Impact in
- Finance top 2%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Papers in
- Accounting 10
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 5
- Corporate Finance and Governance 4
- Private Equity and Venture Capital 2
- Finance 6
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 6
- Co-authors
- Christopher G. Lamoureux (2 shared papers)Gerald D. Newbould (2 shared papers)Cindy Durtschi (1 shared paper)Robert E. Chatfield (2 shared papers)Paul D. Thistle (2 shared papers)Alexander Nill (1 shared paper)Şeyhmus Baloğlu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (2 papers)The Journal of Finance (2 papers)Communications of the ACM (2 papers)Journal of Banking & Finance (1 paper)American Business Law Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Percy Poon
15 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Finance 344
- Accounting 317
- Strategy and Management 113
- Economics and Econometrics 108
- General Decision Sciences 3
Countries citing papers authored by Percy Poon
This map shows the geographic impact of Percy Poon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Percy Poon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Percy Poon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Percy Poon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Percy Poon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Percy Poon. The network helps show where Percy Poon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Percy Poon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 267 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 55 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 13 | An Analysis of the Liquidity Benefits Provided by Secondary Markets | 2008 | 1 |
| 14 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 1 |
About Percy Poon
Percy Poon is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (6 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (2 papers) and Spam and Phishing Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (344 citations), Accounting (317 citations), Strategy and Management (113 citations), Economics and Econometrics (108 citations) and General Decision Sciences (3 citations). Percy Poon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher G. Lamoureux, Gerald D. Newbould, Cindy Durtschi, Robert E. Chatfield, Paul D. Thistle, Alexander Nill and Şeyhmus Baloğlu. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, The Journal of Finance, Communications of the ACM, Journal of Banking & Finance and American Business Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.