Penny Powers
Impact in
- Nephrology top 10%
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
-
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Bone health and treatments
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 5
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 3
- Oncology 6
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 2
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 2
- Bone health and treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Vered Stearns (10 shared papers)N. Lynn Henry (1 shared paper)Dennis C. Ang (1 shared paper)Jill A. Hayden (1 shared paper)Daniel J. Clauw (1 shared paper)Anna Maria Storniolo (2 shared papers)Suzanne Lemler (1 shared paper)Lang Li (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (5 papers)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2 papers)Clinical Cancer Research (1 paper)Science Translational Medicine (1 paper)Transplantation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Penny Powers
13 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Nephrology 41
- Oncology 152
- Cancer Research 80
- Genetics 122
- Transplantation 11
Countries citing papers authored by Penny Powers
This map shows the geographic impact of Penny Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penny Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penny Powers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Penny Powers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penny Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penny Powers. The network helps show where Penny Powers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Penny Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 187 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 |
About Penny Powers
Penny Powers is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Organic Chemistry, having authored 13 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (1 paper) and Bone health and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (41 citations), Oncology (152 citations), Cancer Research (80 citations), Genetics (122 citations) and Transplantation (11 citations). Penny Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Vered Stearns, N. Lynn Henry, Dennis C. Ang, Jill A. Hayden, Daniel J. Clauw, Anna Maria Storniolo, Suzanne Lemler, Lang Li, Daniel F. Hayes and Dina Dadabhoy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Clinical Cancer Research, Science Translational Medicine and Transplantation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.