P.E.J. de Wit
Impact in
-
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
Papers in
- Oncology 5
- Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management 4
-
- Infectious Diseases and Mycology 2
- Co-authors
- Dirk J. Ruiter (3 shared papers)E. Scheffer (2 shared papers)F.H.J. Rampen (2 shared papers)Goos N.P. van Muijen (3 shared papers)Wolter J. Mooi (1 shared paper)André L. M. Verbeek (1 shared paper)W.A.J.G. Lemmens (1 shared paper)G. A. M. de Vaan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Pathology (3 papers)European Journal of Cancer (1 paper)Acta Neuropathologica (1 paper)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)BMC Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
P.E.J. de Wit
12 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Oncology 189
- Cancer Research 78
- Dermatology 39
- Immunology and Allergy 18
- Cell Biology 35
Countries citing papers authored by P.E.J. de Wit
This map shows the geographic impact of P.E.J. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.E.J. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.E.J. de Wit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P.E.J. de Wit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.E.J. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.E.J. de Wit. The network helps show where P.E.J. de Wit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.E.J. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 66 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 7 | Racial differences in mole proneness. | 1989 | 20 |
| 8 | 1992 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 |
About P.E.J. de Wit
P.E.J. de Wit is a scholar working on Oncology, Small Animals, Genetics, Cancer Research and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (4 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Dermatological diseases and infestations (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (1 paper) and Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (189 citations), Cancer Research (78 citations), Dermatology (39 citations), Immunology and Allergy (18 citations) and Cell Biology (35 citations). P.E.J. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dirk J. Ruiter, E. Scheffer, F.H.J. Rampen, Goos N.P. van Muijen, Wolter J. Mooi, André L. M. Verbeek, W.A.J.G. Lemmens, G. A. M. de Vaan, R.M. MACKIE and Eva B. Bröcker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pathology, European Journal of Cancer, Acta Neuropathologica, European Journal of Surgical Oncology and BMC Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.