Johan Bulten

204 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

Johan Bulten
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.3k
  • Reproductive Medicine 962
  • Epidemiology 2.2k
  • Dermatology 293
  • Oncology 652
Replace Leo B. Twiggs with:
Leo B. Twiggs United States
Brigitte M. Ronnett United States
Colin J.R. Stewart Australia
Charles J. Dunton United States
Richard J. Zaino United States
Tang‐Yuan Chu Taiwan
Máire A. Duggan Canada
C. H. Buckley United Kingdom
Seija Grénman Finland
Alexandros Rodolakis Greece
Johan Bulten relative to Leo B. Twiggs United States Leo B. Twiggs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.8×
Leo B. Twiggs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Bulten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Bulten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Bulten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Bulten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Bulten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Bulten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Bulten. The network helps show where Johan Bulten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Bulten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Bulten Line = papers co-authored together Johan Bulten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 206 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008305
2 2005188
3 2009166
4 2014136
5 2010112
6 2017108
7 2007105
8 2009100
9 199994
10 201691
11 201189
12 200785
13 201781
14 199780
15 200878
16
LIQUID COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL CERVICAL CYTOLOGY : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
200877
17 201576
18 201467
19 200667
20 201967

About Johan Bulten

Johan Bulten is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 206 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (61 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (54 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (35 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (18 papers), Genital Health and Disease (15 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (11 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (10 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.3k citations), Reproductive Medicine (962 citations), Epidemiology (2.2k citations), Dermatology (293 citations) and Oncology (652 citations). Johan Bulten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Leon F.A.G. Massuger, Joanne A. de Hullu, Albert G. Siebers, Willem J. G. Melchers, Marc Arbyn, Ruud L.M. Bekkers, Paul J. J. M. Klinkhamer, Pierre L. Martin‐Hirsch, Johanna M. M. Grefte and Christine Bergeron. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Modern Pathology, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact