Peiling Chen

1.1k citations
39 papers · 699 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Peiling Chen

35 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

Peiling Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Modeling and Simulation 39
  • Nephrology 61
  • Clinical Biochemistry 29
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Molecular Biology 175
Replace Yadong Wang with:
Yadong Wang China
Silvana Anna Maria Urru Italy
Hidefumi Komura Japan
Yuan Xue China
Qiu Li China
Eric E. Niederkofler United States
Mary B. Palascak United States
Ling Ye China
Chi‐Ching Chang Taiwan
Frank Shih-Chang Ong United States
Peiling Chen relative to Yadong Wang China Yadong Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.7×
Yadong Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peiling Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peiling Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peiling Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peiling Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peiling Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peiling Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peiling Chen. The network helps show where Peiling Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peiling Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peiling Chen Line = papers co-authored together Peiling Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015142
2 202375
3 202059
4 202259
5 202249
6 202345
7 201942
8 201941
9 201625
10 202320
11 202117
12 202417
13 202513
14 201911
15 202511
16 20227
17 20206
18 20216
19 20226
20 20236

About Peiling Chen

Peiling Chen is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology, Rheumatology and Spectroscopy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 699 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (2 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (39 citations), Nephrology (61 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (29 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations) and Molecular Biology (175 citations). Peiling Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yingying Lin, Yuxiong Guo, Guilang Zheng, Shan Yin, Shaolong Sun, Yanjun Qian, Dehong Li, Yan Hu, Jun Lin and Qiao Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Hypertension, Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Frontiers in Pediatrics and Frontiers in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact