Peer Vries

454 citations
22 papers · 174 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peer Vries

18 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Peer Vries
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Demography 49
  • Economics and Econometrics 106
  • Anthropology 35
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
Replace Regina Grafe with:
Regina Grafe United Kingdom
Pepijn Brandon Netherlands
Herbert H. Kaplan United States
Frank Perlin Netherlands
Niels Steensgaard Denmark
William A. Pettigrew United Kingdom
Wantje Fritschy Netherlands
Yen-P'ing Hao United States
Marjorie Grice–Hutchinson
F.S. Gaastra Netherlands
Peer Vries relative to Regina Grafe United Kingdom Regina Grafe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Regina Grafe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peer Vries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Vries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peer Vries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Vries. The network helps show where Peer Vries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peer Vries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peer Vries Line = papers co-authored together Peer Vries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200141
2 200233
3 201023
4 201317
5 201316
6
Via Peking back to Manchester: Britain, the Industrial Revolution, and China
199114
7 20125
8
Averting a Great Divergence : State and Economy in Japan, 1868-1937
20194
9 20084
10 20193
11 19983
12 20193
13 20122
14 19981
15
A world of surprising resemblances
20091
16 19991
17 20201
18 20221
19 19981
20 20210

About Peer Vries

Peer Vries is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), World Systems and Global Transformations (2 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (1 paper), Indian Economic and Social Development (1 paper), Russia and Soviet political economy (1 paper) and Global Financial Crisis and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (49 citations), Economics and Econometrics (106 citations), Anthropology (35 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (23 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations). Peer Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Felipe Fernández‐Armesto. Their work appears in journals such as Itinerario, Journal of world history, Journal of Global History, International Review of Social History and Journal für Entwicklungspolitik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact