Peer Hoth

12 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Peer Hoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Environmental Chemistry 102
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 50
  • Geophysics 105
  • Mechanics of Materials 160
  • Geology 23
Replace Hugh J. Abercrombie with:
Hugh J. Abercrombie Canada
Barbara Gambardella Italy
Kaul Gena Japan
Paweł Henryk Karnkowski Poland
Charles J. Kaiser United States
William J. Carrigan Saudi Arabia
Rika Takeuchi Japan
Issa Japan
Marianne Nuzzo Germany
N.J.P. Smith United Kingdom
Peer Hoth relative to Hugh J. Abercrombie Canada Hugh J. Abercrombie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hugh J. Abercrombie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peer Hoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Hoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Hoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Hoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peer Hoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Hoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Hoth. The network helps show where Peer Hoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Peer Hoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peer Hoth Line = papers co-authored together Peer Hoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 201083
2 200562
3 201153
4 200551
5 200927
6 199812
7
The Neustadt-Glewe Geothermal Power Plant - Practical Experience in the Reinjection of Cooled Thermal Waters into Sandstone Aquifers
200511
8 200310
9 19978
10 20094
11
Charakteristik der geothermischen Heizzentralen (GHZ) in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
19974
12
GAS SOLUBILITY IN FORMATION WATERS OF THE NORTH GERMAN BASIN - IMPLICATIONS FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY RECOVERY
20002

About Peer Hoth

Peer Hoth is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geology and Geophysics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (6 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (4 papers), Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications (4 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (4 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (3 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (2 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (2 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (102 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (50 citations), Geophysics (105 citations), Mechanics of Materials (160 citations) and Geology (23 citations). Peer Hoth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Volker Lüders, Birgit Mingram, Daniel E. Harlov, David Banks, Jan Harff, Georg Schettler, Stephan M. Weise, Birgit Plessen, Rolf L. Romer and Peter Dulski. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Earth Sciences, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Chemical Geology, Journal of Geochemical Exploration and Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact