Peer Hoth

16 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Peer Hoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 99
  • Mechanics of Materials 134
  • Geophysics 79
  • Geology 22
  • Oceanography 38
Replace H. S. Poelchau with:
H. S. Poelchau Germany
Donald S. Sweetkind United States
W. Leu Switzerland
Nicolaas Molenaar Netherlands
A. A. Avbovbo
Sébastien Haffen France
G. Buonasorte Italy
Claudio Toscano Italy
Soumyajit Mukherjee India
Bernard Kübler Switzerland
Peer Hoth relative to H. S. Poelchau Germany H. S. Poelchau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
H. S. Poelchau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peer Hoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Hoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Hoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Hoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peer Hoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Hoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Hoth. The network helps show where Peer Hoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Peer Hoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peer Hoth Line = papers co-authored together Peer Hoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201094
2 200568
3 201164
4 200552
5 201139
6 200930
7 199812
8 200311
9
Fazies und Diagenese von Präperm-Sedimenten der Geotraverse Harz-Rügen
199710
10
The Neustadt-Glewe Geothermal Power Plant - Practical Experience in the Reinjection of Cooled Thermal Waters into Sandstone Aquifers
200510
11 19979
12 20116
13
Charakteristik der geothermischen Heizzentralen (GHZ) in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
19974
14
GAS SOLUBILITY IN FORMATION WATERS OF THE NORTH GERMAN BASIN - IMPLICATIONS FOR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY RECOVERY
20003
15 20093
16 20061

About Peer Hoth

Peer Hoth is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Mechanics of Materials, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Geology and Paleontology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (5 papers), Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications (4 papers), Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (3 papers), Marine and environmental studies (2 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (2 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (2 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (1 paper) and Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (99 citations), Mechanics of Materials (134 citations), Geophysics (79 citations), Geology (22 citations) and Oceanography (38 citations). Peer Hoth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Volker Lüders, Birgit Plessen, Jan Harff, Daniel E. Harlov, Saulius Šliaupa, David Archibald Banks, Georg Schettler, Stephan M. Weise, Peter Dulski and Rolf L. Romer. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Earth Sciences, Chemical Geology, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Geochemical Exploration and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact