Peer Fehling
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
- Analytical Chemistry top 10%
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Papers in
-
- Synthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles 4
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 3
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 2
- Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis 2
- Edible Oils Quality and Analysis 2
- Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms 1
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics 1
-
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents 2
- Co-authors
- Frank Pudel (2 shared papers)Anne Freudenstein (2 shared papers)Bertrand Matthäus (2 shared papers)Klaus Vosmann (1 shared paper)Rainer Beckert (8 shared papers)Manfred Döring (5 shared papers)Helmar Görls (5 shared papers)Falk Knoch (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology (2 papers)Tetrahedron (1 paper)Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry (2 papers)Chemische Berichte (1 paper)Journal für praktische Chemie (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Peer Fehling
9 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Organic Chemistry 317
- Analytical Chemistry 74
- Food Science 91
- Inorganic Chemistry 64
- Process Chemistry and Technology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Peer Fehling
This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Fehling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Fehling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Fehling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peer Fehling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Fehling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Fehling. The network helps show where Peer Fehling may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peer Fehling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 140 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 61 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 19 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 0 |
About Peer Fehling
Peer Fehling is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles (4 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (3 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (2 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Edible Oils Quality and Analysis (2 papers), Cyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms (1 paper) and Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (317 citations), Analytical Chemistry (74 citations), Food Science (91 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (64 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (9 citations). Peer Fehling has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Frank Pudel, Anne Freudenstein, Bertrand Matthäus, Klaus Vosmann, Rainer Beckert, Manfred Döring, Helmar Görls, Falk Knoch, Wolfgang Imhof and Peter Langer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, Tetrahedron, Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry, Chemische Berichte and Journal für praktische Chemie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.