Pedro Naves
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Ecology top 5%
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management
Papers in
- Ecology 29
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 28
-
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control 14
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 14
- Co-authors
- Edmundo Sousa (33 shared papers)José Alberto Quartau (6 shared papers)Luís Bonifácio (9 shared papers)Manuel Mota (4 shared papers)M. A. Bravo (3 shared papers)Ana Catarina Penas (3 shared papers)Susana Camacho (3 shared papers)Maria L. Inácio (9 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Pedro Naves
42 papers receiving 780 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Insect Science 530
- Ecology 546
- Plant Science 520
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 154
- Cell Biology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Naves
This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Naves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Naves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Naves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Naves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Naves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Naves. The network helps show where Pedro Naves may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pedro Naves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 177 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 32 | |
| 10 | Biology of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) in the Pine Wilt Disease Affected Zone, Southern Portugal | 2008 | 31 |
| 11 | 2006 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 11 |
About Pedro Naves
Pedro Naves is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cell Biology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 841 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (28 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (19 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (14 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (4 papers) and Hemiptera Insect Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (530 citations), Ecology (546 citations), Plant Science (520 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (154 citations) and Cell Biology (62 citations). Pedro Naves has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Edmundo Sousa, José Alberto Quartau, Luís Bonifácio, Manuel Mota, M. A. Bravo, Ana Catarina Penas, Susana Camacho, Maria L. Inácio, Margarida C. Vieira and Filomena Nóbrega. Their work appears in journals such as Acarologia, Journal of Applied Entomology, Journal of Pest Science, Annals of Applied Biology and Forests.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.