Paula Meth
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 0.5%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
-
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Participatory Visual Research Methods
Papers in
-
- South African History and Culture 5
- Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics 5
- Sex work and related issues 3
-
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 16
- Urban Planning and Governance 5
- Co-authors
- Sarah Charlton (9 shared papers)Glyn Williams (6 shared papers)Katie Willis (3 shared papers)Alison Todes (2 shared papers)Tom Goodfellow (2 shared papers)Darshini Mahadevia (1 shared paper)Karen Coelho (1 shared paper)Charlotte Lemanski (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Area (3 papers)International Development Planning Review (3 papers)Geoforum (3 papers)Urban Forum (2 papers)International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth AfricaIndia
In The Last Decade
Paula Meth
34 papers receiving 675 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Urban Studies 301
- Sociology and Political Science 374
- Geography, Planning and Development 43
- Finance 70
- Gender Studies 60
Countries citing papers authored by Paula Meth
This map shows the geographic impact of Paula Meth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paula Meth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paula Meth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paula Meth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paula Meth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paula Meth. The network helps show where Paula Meth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Paula Meth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 59 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 50 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 13 |
About Paula Meth
Paula Meth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, General Health Professions, Finance and Law, having authored 36 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban and Rural Development Challenges (16 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (5 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (5 papers), South African History and Culture (5 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (5 papers) and Sex work and related issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (301 citations), Sociology and Political Science (374 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (43 citations), Finance (70 citations) and Gender Studies (60 citations). Paula Meth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and India. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Charlton, Glyn Williams, Katie Willis, Alison Todes, Tom Goodfellow, Darshini Mahadevia, Karen Coelho, Charlotte Lemanski, Tanja Bastia and Katy Jenkins. Their work appears in journals such as Area, International Development Planning Review, Geoforum, Urban Forum and International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.