Paul Jay
Impact in
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
- Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Latin American and Latino Studies
Papers in
-
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 6
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship 2
-
- Latin American and Latino Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Jane Marie Todd (1 shared paper)H. Porter Abbott (1 shared paper)Leonard Cassuto (1 shared paper)Gerald Graff (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Callaloo (2 papers)American Literature (2 papers)PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (2 papers)American Literary History (2 papers)Arizona quarterly/The Arizona quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul Jay
24 papers receiving 169 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 150
- Cultural Studies 40
- Philosophy 43
- Anthropology 33
- History 33
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Jay
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Jay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Jay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Jay. The network helps show where Paul Jay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Paul Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 48 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 15 | Fear of Being Useful | 2012 | 3 |
| 16 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 17 | The Post-Post Colonial Condition: Globalization and Historical Allegory in Mohsin Hamid’s Moth Smoke | 2005 | 3 |
| 18 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 2 |
About Paul Jay
Paul Jay is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (6 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Globalization and Cultural Identity (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (2 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (150 citations), Cultural Studies (40 citations), Philosophy (43 citations), Anthropology (33 citations) and History (33 citations). Paul Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marie Todd, H. Porter Abbott, Leonard Cassuto and Gerald Graff. Their work appears in journals such as Callaloo, American Literature, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, American Literary History and Arizona quarterly/The Arizona quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.