Paul Jay

752 citations
30 papers · 389 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
    • Autobiographical and Biographical Writing
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Rhetoric and Communication Studies

Papers in

Paul Jay

28 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers

Paul Jay
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Literature and Literary Theory 196
  • Philosophy 64
  • Cultural Studies 42
  • Anthropology 38
  • History 38
Replace Christopher Looby with:
Christopher Looby United States
François Jost France
Antony Easthope United States
Carla Kaplan United States
Sonja Laden Israel
Rebecca L. Walkowitz United States
Jeremy Hawthorn Norway
Wulf Koepke United States
Elliott Rabin
Thomas O. Beebee United States
Paul Jay relative to Christopher Looby United States Christopher Looby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Christopher Looby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Jay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Jay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Jay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Jay. The network helps show where Paul Jay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Paul Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Jay Line = papers co-authored together Paul Jay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201080
2 200153
3 198636
4 201432
5 198932
6 199824
7 200117
8 199814
9 198914
10 198213
11 198610
12 20219
13 19877
14 19977
15 20146
16 19925
17
Fear of Being Useful
20124
18 20064
19 20143
20 20213

About Paul Jay

Paul Jay is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (6 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Globalization and Cultural Identity (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (196 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Cultural Studies (42 citations), Anthropology (38 citations) and History (38 citations). Paul Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marie Todd, H. Porter Abbott, Leonard Cassuto and Gerald Graff. Their work appears in journals such as PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, American Literature, American Literary History, Callaloo and MLN.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact