Paul Guild

610 citations
22 papers · 407 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Guild

22 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Paul Guild
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 236
  • Business and International Management 35
  • Strategy and Management 177
  • Accounting 76
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 44
Replace Kirk C. Heriot with:
Kirk C. Heriot United States
Robert Demir Sweden
Malavika Sundararajan United States
George Tovstiga United Kingdom
Jens Schmidt Finland
Susan K. Cohen United States
Giulio Ferrigno Italy
Willem A. Smit Netherlands
Kathleen R. Allen United States
Shantha Liyanage Australia
Paul Guild relative to Kirk C. Heriot United States Kirk C. Heriot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Kirk C. Heriot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Guild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Guild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Guild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Guild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Guild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Guild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Guild. The network helps show where Paul Guild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Paul Guild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Guild Line = papers co-authored together Paul Guild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010136
2 201043
3 200739
4 202238
5 200329
6 200523
7 200719
8 197819
9 199111
10
Equity investment decisions for technology based ventures
201410
11 20077
12 19946
13 20035
14 19914
15 20084
16 19754
17 19763
18 19772
19 20062
20 20071

About Paul Guild

Paul Guild is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, Computer Science Applications and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (10 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (4 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (4 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (2 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (236 citations), Business and International Management (35 citations), Strategy and Management (177 citations), Accounting (76 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (44 citations). Paul Guild has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Rod B. McNaughton, Zelimir W Todorovic, Antonio J. Bailetti, Lloyd Strickland, John C. Barefoot, Donald Gerwin, D. George and Mustafa Yavuz. Their work appears in journals such as Technovation, R and D Management, International Journal of Technology Management, European Journal of Social Psychology and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact