Paul E. Kish

560 citations
9 papers · 406 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
  • Biophysics top 10%
    • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research

Papers in

    • Forensic and Genetic Research 7
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 3
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 1

Paul E. Kish

9 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Paul E. Kish
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Safety Research 120
  • Biophysics 46
  • Genetics 188
  • Insect Science 82
  • Archeology 69
Replace Jonathan Creamer with:
Jonathan Creamer Australia
Ross M. Gardner United States
Williams Mazzella Switzerland
Ray Wickenheiser United States
André Braz Brazil
R. Austin Hicklin United States
Piyamas Kanokwongnuwut Australia
E Springer Israel
Rudolf Haraksim Italy
Maria Antonia Roberts United States
Paul E. Kish relative to Jonathan Creamer Australia Jonathan Creamer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Jonathan Creamer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul E. Kish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul E. Kish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul E. Kish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul E. Kish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul E. Kish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul E. Kish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul E. Kish. The network helps show where Paul E. Kish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Paul E. Kish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul E. Kish Line = papers co-authored together Paul E. Kish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Principles of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis: Theory and Practice
2005136
2 2005115
3 201251
4 201644
5 201626
6 202126
7
The Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Act of 1980
19813
8 20103
9 20022

About Paul E. Kish

Paul E. Kish is a scholar working on Genetics, Archeology, Safety Research, Insect Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (2 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (1 paper), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (1 paper) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (120 citations), Biophysics (46 citations), Genetics (188 citations), Insect Science (82 citations) and Archeology (69 citations). Paul E. Kish has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stuart James, Michael Taylor, Glynn Owens, Thomas A. Busey, Connie L. Parks, R. Austin Hicklin and Atsushi Yamashita. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) and The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact