Paul Cavanagh

3.1k citations
9 papers · 315 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Paul Cavanagh

8 papers receiving 270 citations

Peers

Paul Cavanagh
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Small Animals 110
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 150
  • Equine 7
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 5
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 8
Replace K Rasmussen with:
K Rasmussen Denmark
H. B. von Stockhausen Germany
David Phear United Kingdom
Th. Senge Germany
Paul A. Tomlinson New Zealand
H. Sarre Germany
R M Kirk United Kingdom
G Ratti Italy
Georgina Nakafero United Kingdom
Goldie Djuricin United States
Paul Cavanagh relative to K Rasmussen Denmark K Rasmussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.7×
K Rasmussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Cavanagh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Cavanagh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Cavanagh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Cavanagh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Cavanagh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Cavanagh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Cavanagh. The network helps show where Paul Cavanagh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Paul Cavanagh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Cavanagh Line = papers co-authored together Paul Cavanagh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1983207
2 198459
3 200129
4 199614
5 20012
6 19991
7 20131
8 19901
9
New Scientist archive
20051

About Paul Cavanagh

Paul Cavanagh is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Clinical Psychology, Hematology and Physiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Sports injuries and prevention (1 paper), Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper), Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (110 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (150 citations), Equine (7 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (8 citations). Paul Cavanagh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Peterson, Gerald D. Johnson, Peter P. Kintzer, Philip R. Fox, Duncan C. Ferguson, D. Vaughn Becker, Michael S. Leib, Arthur I. Hurvitz, Chris Brymer and Cynthia A. Loveland Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Emergency Nursing, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Psychiatric Bulletin and Gerontology & Geriatrics Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact