Paul Breiding

24 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

Paul Breiding
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Computational Mathematics 96
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 61
  • Computational Mechanics 53
  • Numerical Analysis 13
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 26
Replace Enrico Carlini with:
Enrico Carlini Italy
Hirotachi Abo United States
Zach Teitler United States
Samuel B. Hopkins United States
Vassil Kanev Italy
Yaroslav Shitov Russia
Maria Virginia Catalisano Italy
Wen-Ching Winnie Li United States
Alessandro Gimigliano Italy
Ely Kerman United States
Paul Breiding relative to Enrico Carlini Italy Enrico Carlini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Enrico Carlini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Breiding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Breiding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Breiding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Breiding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Breiding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Breiding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Breiding. The network helps show where Paul Breiding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Paul Breiding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Breiding Line = papers co-authored together Paul Breiding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A Riemannian trust region method for the canonical tensor rank approximation problem
201827
2 201827
3 202313
4 201711
5 201711
6 202110
7 20199
8 20188
9 20237
10 20235
11 20234
12 20224
13 20243
14 20233
15 20232
16 20192
17 20242
18 20231
19
The average number of critical rank-one-approximations to a symmetric tensor
20171
20 20221

About Paul Breiding

Paul Breiding is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computational Mathematics, Computational Mechanics, Geometry and Topology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 26 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tensor decomposition and applications (10 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (7 papers), Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (3 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers), Point processes and geometric inequalities (2 papers) and Algorithms and Data Compression (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (96 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (61 citations), Computational Mechanics (53 citations), Numerical Analysis (13 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (26 citations). Paul Breiding has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nick Vannieuwenhoven, Mateusz Michałek, Oded Zilberberg, Carlos Beltrán, Bernd Sturmfels, Javier del Pino and Peter Bürgisser. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Optimization, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software and Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact